politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Disappointed to see Jacobin taking the threat of the wealthy leaving seriously...
It's fucking New York, raise property tax and raise it more for any person (or corporation without a majority of owners) that lives outside of New York.
Stop fucking acting like we can't do shit, because the wealthy might retaliate. They haven't stopped the class war, they're fighting as hard as possible and willing to cross any line.
Anyone saying we can't fight back because they might retaliate is ignorant of the entire history of America. They're already doing everything they can to fuck us over.
If the wealthy say they'll leave because of progressive the response should be only:
And then go back to talking about progressive policy to voters.
Don't let them stop what's working by changing the subject.
The article was talking about how Mamdani will have to handle the rich if he is elected. For the rest of us it suggests revolution.
The thing about the rich leaving is.... It doesn't matter if they do. What actual work do they do to produce the profits? Absolutely fuck all.
Imagine for a moment that all billionaires suddenly left the county. They'd effectively be abandoning their properties, which so long as progressive policies are in place, wouldn't create a power vacuum where another rich asshole steps in and does the same or worse than the last one.
WE are the producers. Implement progressive policy, make work more fair and everyone except the leaches (ownership leaches, not the disabled) benefit.
Again, as you stated, progressive policy is the way to first, make the leaches leave, but also make the leaving not further destructive to society as a whole.
They wouldn't...
They can't take a fucking skyscraper with them, and they still pay property tax where it's at.
That's why I'm saying if you wanted to keep them, you'd drastically raise property tax, with a reduction for states residents. Especially when talking housing, that would be huge.
A homestead taxed at 5% or an investment property at 25% means investment firms aren't just going to stop buying, they'll start selling. Which would solve but at least alleviate the housing crisis.
Like, specifically NYC, they're in a weird situation they want to reduce the price of real estate. It can't happen too fast tho or it 08 all over again.
But the best thing to reduce real estate prices, is taxing the fuck out of investment properties. Maybe throw a multi-year plan out there so it gets more and more painful every year. That way it's not a fire sale all at once.
We have plenty of options, we just need to elect politicians willing to use them
Right. Rich people leaving New York is a feature, not a bug. It’s not like they pay taxes and any “investment” they do is extractive (eg landlords).
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
The article ends with
Imo. they aren't buckling to it. The article points out that under the current system it is a real threat to the politician Mamdani. So it is up to the people to back him up in pushing for meaningful change as well as put the pressure for real change to the corrupted system.
Unlike other classifications of people, it’s relatively easy to create new rich people. Isn’t that what these people think the American Dream is all about? Is this group of rich people opposed to the American Dream?