this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
704 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

73495 readers
2823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Since it's an open source project, it's pretty easy to make a fork and readd Linux support.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (13 children)

The licence doesn't permit derivative works, so no forks and no downstream packages.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the license change is invalid as it's based from GPL3 code and previous contributors did not allow the change

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It looks like the change happened nearly a year ago, and no one's kicked up a fuss, so either it was done properly (i.e. past contributors were contacted and consented to the licence change, and any that didn't had their contributions replaced), or there's a big problem once a past contributor notices.

It doesn't make it any more legal to fork the project without going back to the last GPL3 commit, though, as any contributions after the license change have to be assumed to be covered by the new licence, so the combined work would be under an invalid licence (as the old and new licences aren't compatible) rather than being still covered by the old licence.

Normally, I'd completely dismiss the possibility that a licence change like this could have been done properly, but Stenzek is associated with Dolphin Emulator, which did manage to pull off a switch from GPL2 to GPL3+ by emailing lots of people and replacing a lot of code.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Make a fork that supports Linux as satire since the whole situation is so crazy.

Edit: The joke being you could argue it's fair use.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)