this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
121 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74003 readers
3092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A group representing several major airlines alongside travel companies and airports is opposing a Senate bill that would require the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to generally use manual ID verification at security checkpoints instead of facial recognition.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), would broadly restrict TSA’s ability to use biometrics and facial recognition, carving out a few exemptions for the agency’s PreCheck and other Trusted Traveler programs. Passengers may still opt in to the use of facial recognition at the checkpoint.

In a letter Monday to Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the air industry groups said the law was a “step backward” and that facial recognition technology made security screenings far more efficient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

the air industry groups said the law was a “step backward” and that facial recognition technology made security screenings far more efficient.

There's that word again. Is there anything that can't be justified by efficiency?

It never is, never has been, and probably never will be very efficient to slow down and consider the brand new set of issues created by efficiency. You're just standing in the way of progress, and that's tomorrow's problem anyway. Let them figure it out. I'm sure they'll come up with an efficient solution.

EPIC et al. Call on Congress to Codify Protections for Travelers From TSA Facial Recognition July 30, 2025

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know what else is efficient? Actual security instead of the theater they put travelers through currently.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm sure once every human is replaced by shitty automated AI the entire process will become smoother than our darkest nightmares can imagine.

Book your flight. Hop into your driverless taxi, and if you survive the trip to the airport, use the facial recognition option to breeze right on through security within minutes (assuming you're the right color of passenger) without even taking off your shoes.

No need for air traffic control, flight attendants, or even pilots. You can can walk straight on to the overcrowded plane, settle in, put on your headphones and sleep mask, then nosedive straight into the ocean without ever having to acknowledge another human being. Until the rude asshole sitting next to you suddenly bothers you with some stupid shit like "Oh God why aren't the oxygen masks dropping? That used to be automatic! Our father who art in heaven. Hallowed be thy name..."

You roll your eyes and put your headphones and mask back on to enjoy the soothing sounds of autotune AI generated parody songs you made on the ride to the airport. What the fuck is that guy even talking about anyway? You don't know and you don't care. You didn't pay for first class to have some rando kill your vacay vibe. You take a deep breath (but there's no oxygen) smile and settle back in, knowing that soon you will reach your final destination.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Haha, nice. Reminds me of the libertarian detective copypasta.