this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10700 readers
207 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

Eh, I can see some political rational behind the carve out. I think the rational is a bit naive though.

Probably something along the lines of “well he’ll just veto it if it touches his money, and by making it only apply if he some how gets a third term that encourages him not to try it” as if him getting a third term would imply anything but a total break down of the legal system that could enforce a divestment.