this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
729 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8757 readers
2189 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Crustaceans: Crab

Mammals: ~~Weasel~~ Crab

Plants: ~~Tree~~ Grass. Everything grass.

Amphibians & Reptiles: ~~Unchanged because they are perfect~~ Crab

Birds: ~~360° around back to dinosaurs~~ First of all, avian dinosaurs are dinosaurs. Secondly, 360° doesn't really make sense, probably they meant 180°. Finally, crab.

Fungi: I shan't speculate on the affairs of gods.

Moral of the story: You might not like it but decapods are peak animal evolution. All roads lead to crab.

Secondly, 360° doesn't really make sense, probably they meant 180°.

It makes sense if you consider birds to be a mid-360° position of dinosaur evolution. They started at "classic" dinosaurs, pivoted to the avian variety, and will continue to pivot until they return to their classic form.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Hotel? Trivago.

^ Winner of the thread.

[–] muzzle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Plant evolution is anything but stable. They keep evolving and devolving from weeds to trees and back every few 100 generations.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

360° makes sense if the starting point was dinosaurs. Birds would be the 180° mark.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago

Mammals: Anteater

Ants: Crab

Mammals: Crabeater

[–] la508@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Ring the crab bell

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Misusing 360° where you should use 180° is a running joke

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

Ah good point. I'm more used to people doing it unintentionally.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I don't mind being a crab imagine not working. Just be crab.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

One fungus will eventually manage to mind control the crabs, like some already do with ants.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Hopefully, in a less destructive and more symbiotic manner. As much as I have a grudge against odorous house ants, I wouldn't wish cordyceps on them, much less our future crab descendents.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even grass evolves to tree - look at bamboo

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

you seem like an expert and I was actually wondering this yesterday while I was out on a walk cause I tend to think about silly things. So Theropods evolved into birds right? what about Sauropods or like Triceratops? or did they just go extinct

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Groups never evolve into something. Species do.

Theropods are a group comprising a lot of species.

There was one species of theropod that evolved a few characterics we associate with birds. They evolved into a few species and some of them evolved into yet more species. They're at the origin of the whole bird group.

See it like a tree with branches branching out with many branchss just getting cut short. One of that branching branch is the bird group, and it's on the branching branch of theropod.

And yes, the branching branchs that are Sauropods and Ornithischia were all completely cut at the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction 65 million years ago.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Thank you, appreciate the answer.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah. It was admittedly a bit heartbreaking to discover that it appears that there are no extant descendents of any sauropod or ornithischia species. :(

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These are actually questions that I've asked and done digging about in info sources on. I'm sad to report that it does appear that only descendents of theropod species appear to have survived. :(