this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4106 readers
147 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link for those of us without a banking license.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (9 children)

This is a strange bit of public feuding between the government and BoE.

Revolute is an interesting company which might be first to introduce Wero (EU based Visa/Mastercard competitor) to the UK, which is competition we need, but they are also heavily involved with crypto.

I just don’t know who is getting bribed and influenced the most, or in the end what is the best for the people.

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Generally the BoE makes a lot of sense, and I don't see anything here that would change my position. I haven't seen whether Revolut has had their licence upgraded from limited yet, but that has to be due any day now that they've had their 1 year limited trial to prove operations.

When you are dealing with peoples money, I don't want these things to get rushed, and Reeves saying things like

Reeves has placed cutting red-tape on the financial services sector and other industries at the heart of her mission to turbocharge the UK’s faltering economy and has blamed over-cautious watchdogs for holding back growth.

Financial services is doing great. Probably one of the best performing parts of the UK, why don't you concentrate on literally anything else, like taxing unearned income?

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I haven't seen whether Revolut has had their licence upgraded from limited yet, but that has to be due any day now that they've had their 1 year limited trial to prove operations.

This is the point I don’t really get, if their licence is days away from issue anyway why would Reeves meeting with them be a problem?

No argument from me regarding a wealth/unearned income tax, how this has not be implemented is beyond me. It just reeks of corruption.

[–] frazorth@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

This is the point I don’t really get, if their licence is days away from issue anyway why would Reeves meeting with them be a problem?

Because financial institutions, including the BoE have a lot more on the line, and need to keep reputational appearance even if politicians don't care because they will be out on the streets before the next election.

What's Reeves hoping to gain from this, while making claims of "cutting red tape"? It sounds like simple political interference, and as such she can fuck off.

load more comments (7 replies)