this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
216 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
2457 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (20 children)

So they just plugged it directly into the same network switch the ATM is on? That sounds incredibly dumb. The only ATMs I've seen the inside of had the network switch locked inside with the vault.

Also our bank had some kind of port security so if it wasn't a recognized MAC address, the port just switched off.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (16 children)

Also our bank had some kind of port security so if it wasn't a recognized MAC address, the port just switched off.

And serious company will have this as basic security. It's a fundamental function even available on your consumer grade router at home. While it's overkill for that use, it's basic security for a company.

That's why it's not surprising at all that a bank didn't bother to do that. Banks have some of the most egregious security issues.

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

... Which financial company do you work for?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s why it’s not surprising at all that a bank didn’t bother to do that. Banks have some of the most egregious security issues.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Same as anywhere else. Complacency, lax auditing, temporary fixes which are in place for years, non-technical people making technical decisions (choosing convenience over security, generally).

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Remember when John Stewart only had SOME grey hair?

Hey, no judgement. 2020 had my hair looking like santa claus.

[–] sys110x@feddit.nl 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't stress mate. We've all aged in the 20 years between 2019 and 2025.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

2019? Wow. That's in the before times.

Yeah my beard has gone fully salt-and-pepper, and I’m getting a lot more grays on my head nowadays :/

[–] TheRagingGeek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Any of the major banks consider breaches as cost of doing business at their scale compared to smaller banks. My bank prides itself on never having a breach, and it is insufferable to develop code for, but I guess it’s the price of security

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)