this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
718 points (92.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

36337 readers
1125 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I feel like the people I interact with irl don't even know how to boot from a USB. People here probably know how to do some form of coding or at least navigate a directory through the command line. Stg I would bet money on the average person not even being able to create a Lemmy account without assistance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kernelle@0d.gs 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nowhere have they been compared

less equipped

Can't do the reading for you..

This stuff has been talked about for at least 5 years. Here's two studies that have come to the same conclusions. By The University of Toledo and the ICILS EU.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Here's the full quote

"Gen Z may be less equipped for the future of technical work than we think."

Less then people think does not mean less than other generations. Also this claim is based off of results from a self evaluation by gen z.

This is from the first source you mentioned.

"Many millennials, individuals born between 1981 and 1996, and the Generation Z population, born after 1997, have learned to be great, efficient consumers of technology, such as sending pictures, sharing videos and texting or other short-form communication."

"However, they are far less adept at understanding how to use technology to create useful solutions to their business challenges "

Doesn't compare gen z against millennials nor does it state that either are less tech savvy then previous generations just that the tech demands of work have been increasing faster then the education standards. That is to say that while tech literacy has gone up the demand for tech skills has grown further. This study does not say at all that tech literacy has been declining.

Following through to the study in the second source, "The results demonstrate that significant efforts are needed in order to move closer to the ambitious EU-level target of reducing the share of low-achieving students in computer and information literacy to less than 15% by 2030." That is to say the source is showing how education targets are failing to be reached not that education levels are declining. This study also does not compare generational tech literacy levels.

Very strange to see all these sources that supposedly show tech literacy is declining generationally yet none of them are any studies of the level of tech skills each generation has had during the period they were joining the workforce and a subsequent comparison. Almost like that's a made up abstraction based off of vibes.

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Conveniently left out the relevant part:

However, they (they as in Gen Z) are far less (less as in compared with the Millennials) adept at understanding how to use technology to create useful solutions to their business challenges — for example, using Outlook to send e-mail, Word to prepare documents, Excel to analyze data and PowerPoint to communicate through presentations.

This, togheter with the previous paragraph which you mentioned, is talking about a direct comparison of Gen Z and Millennials and it directly states Gen Z is less tech savvy than Millennials.

This study does not say at all that tech literacy has been declining.

But it does, like multiple times, even on paragraphs you quoted.

I provide you with multiple sources explaining how tech literacy is declining, you keep saying they don't compare. What do you think less means? What do you think declining means? It means they are comparing.

Try wasting someone else's time lmao

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"However, they (they as in Gen Z) are far less (less as in compared with the Millennials) adept at understanding how to use technology"

You just added in the "they as in gen z" and the "less than millennials part" into the text. The text is referring to both millennials and gen z at this part in the text and it is comparing them to their older counterparts which would be gen x and boomers lol. There is also no source for this claim it's just what some guy thinks. No actual study or data is provided.

The article does not compare gen z and millennials. Show me the unedited quote. Of them doing that.

Show me the quotes where it says tech literacy is declining. Like I said, you're making abstractions based off of vibes. None of your sources provide any data showing tech literacy declining.