this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
635 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25045 readers
2664 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The intrigue: The "Rule of Five" law allows any five members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to request federal agencies to provide information about "any matter within the jurisdiction of the committee."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotForYourStereo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Weird how they want it released now, but didn't do shit about it under Biden...

Almost like it's all theatrics for them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

The finance committee requested the files, got them, wrote up subpoenas based on those files and were blocked by republiQans.

All under Biden. Still ready to go, just get the GQP to do anything at all.

[–] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Too little was done out of fear Trump would capitalize on it.

And look how that turned out.

[–] zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Gerblat@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’re saying that the Biden administration didn’t want to release the info and stir the pot. They were afraid that the ~~fascists~~ republicans would do something shitty in retaliation.

Which of course, the GOP was always gonna do anyway, because they have always tried to get away with whatever they could. So now we get the fallout without the payoff of actually getting the files released

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It will never get released. The Democrats get to act like they want to release it while the Republicans are blocking it now. This is very bad theater.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can imagine it like a scene in a sitcom. They are both yanking on the documents in a tug of war in front of an audience of citizens. Only for someone to slip and the documents fly into the air and rain down on the citizens by accident, fucking them both over.

We can only hope.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed. What would make that sitcom even better is if it ended with a surprise guillotine

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Why would they release the files when it could put active investigations at risk? John Q Public doesn't need to know who's name is on the list if the justice department is doing it's job properly. Now that it's not we might as well know how trump prefers 14yo's that look like his daughter.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

lol 14 status-quo democrats downvoted the truth