this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
269 points (94.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
1151 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/33704049

Wanted to add, "Fuck Cars!!"

Car payments for decades of one's life are not the way to go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 39 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I remember talking with some Americans a few years ago, they worked in the tech industry, so definitely on the upper side of the income range. And even they said they were feeling the crunch around 2022-2023. I can only imagine how it felt for the regular people.

Quite the contrast with the official numbers which claimed the American economy is growing. Let's just say that the election outcome was not surprising.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well the rich are gaining obscene amounts of money. So many of the large companies are pulling in record profits. So in that sense, the american economy is growing. The peoblem is theyre squeezing the rest of us for that.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

60% of Americans living pay check to pay check for whatever reason. In 2008 this number was 40%.

There is no way to tell why this is happening. 🤡

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Article:

https://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/us-news/living-pay-cheque-to-pay-cheque-you-are-not-alone-68-of-americans-are-too/3923390/

Source Study:

https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/PYMNTS-New-Reality-Check-February-March-2024.pdf

Oh hey, Forbes says nearly 72% of those living paycheck to paycheck have less than $2,000 in savings!

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/banking/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-statistics-2024/

Yeah, this is what an economic collapse looks like, Great Depression 2.0, hold onto your butt, and good luck.

EDIT:

We also have a massive negative net worth problem.

Negative net worth means you have more debt than assets.

Because this is difficult to measure accurately, unless you are a credit bureau....we've got anywhere between 1 in 10 and 1 in 3 Americans with more debt than assets, ie, they are de facto debt slaves.

https://www.creditkarma.com/about/commentary/americans-have-a-net-worth-problem-and-its-not-positive

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/whats-your-net-worth-25-of-americans-say-theirs-is-%240-or-less

https://www.aspeninstitute.org/blog-posts/thirteen-million-us-households-have-negative-net-worth-will-they-ever-move-from-debt-to-wealth/

These are all from 2 or 3 years ago, I imagine its now closer to 1 in 3 than 1 in 10.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Every time you hear about 'the economy', replace it with 'rich people yacht money'.

And it only works when 'the economy' is strong, rising, booming, zooming, etc.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Quite the contrast with the official numbers which claimed the American economy is growing. Let’s just say that the election outcome was not surprising.

Between that and Biden refusing to take action regarding Gaza, the election was forfeited in 2023.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Biden refusing to take action regarding Gaza, the election was forfeited in 2023.

Which is bizarre because Trump promised the extermination of all Palestinians.

"Don't vote for Biden because he won't stop genocide. Let Trump win because he promised to help genocide."

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being anti Genocide isn't a "purity test" it's a absic requirement. If a candidate for offices fails that and loses it's their fault 100%

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But the weirdness isn't that Harris lost by not saying she would stop the genocide. It is that Trump win by promising genocide.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

By making it bipartisan they removed it as an issue to differenciate cannidates

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just ignore what I said about the economy and blame everything on people who are anti-genocide.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I only meant to point out that one weirdness.

But "the economy is bad" was another.

"Don't vote for Biden because the economy is bad now. Let Trump win because the economy was worse than when Trump was last president."