this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
197 points (99.0% liked)

News

31365 readers
3249 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Starbucks has built out a 4,624-square-foot office — replete with "luxury" finishes — that CEO Brian Niccol can use while home in Newport Beach, California.

In addition to giving him a $1.6 million base salary and stock rewards of more than $95 million in his first four months on the job, the filing said, the company would establish a "small remote office" near Niccol's home in Orange County so he wouldn't have to commute daily to Starbucks' Seattle base.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Which makes sense because home offices aren’t a tax deduction anymore, but a small remote office is a business expense.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It doesn't make sense because none of the other corporate employees are going to be there with him meaning it's no different than if he (or they) just worked from home to begin with. It's essentially the same as if they turned his home garage into an "office."

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It makes sense from an accounting perspective: no deduction versus large deduction.

I agree it’s stupid from a practical perspective.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That doesn't really make sense because they're still spending that money. A $1M/yr business expense on a new office that gives you a $1M/yr tax deduction isn't putting you ahead financially.

What you're missing from the "no deduction" side is that they're also not spending additional money on new offices.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It makes more sense than having him commute via private jet like he used to

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be a business expense as well? I agree it's the more sane option, but they're both still insanely hypocritical options when compared to allowing remote work.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it is. But if the CEO has a home office he doesn’t get a deduction.

Honestly I’m amazed he didn’t buy the office and lease it back to the company. That sounds like the sort of sleaze I expect from the C-suite

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I just now realized you're referring to a personal deduction for a home office and not a corporate deduction for the home office. I see what you're getting at now and wouldn't be surprised if that were the case.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

People don't understand how deductions work. A deduction doesn't mean the tax many pays for it.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which makes sense, but at the same time does not make sense.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, either both should be deductions or neither should be.

I used to get the home office deduction because I worked from home and my employer didn’t have an office to get the business expense. But now fully remote companies are de facto taxed more than ones with an office.