this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

Ukraine

10481 readers
169 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯

πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ

πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz
62
Video appears to show Putin's bodyguards armed with a handheld anti-drone interceptor (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 4 days ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How much range does it have? I doubt it can stop a well-aimed full-speed kamikaze

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It works by physically ramming the incoming drone, so it probably can knock things off course

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FPV drones can go over 160 km/h, and can carry thermobaric warheads.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't pretend to be an expert on these things, but this is also a drone and it does not need to carry the weight of a large battery or an explosive payload. Surely it should be expected to at least match the performance of the incoming drone?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's much harder to hit something going 160 km/h than to hit something static with a munition going 160 km/h.

And a thermobaric munition is like the miniaturised version of the MOAB that the US was busting bunkers with in Afghanistan.

Point is, even if it hits the drone 100 m away, I don't think that would be safe for the target. The primary defense is still jamming, but that is ineffective against wire-guided stuff.

It's not useless, but I don't think Putin is safe either. It could also be a cope cage like thing, where the point is just the appearance of safety to calm Putin's nerves and to discourage attackers.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A 2kg thermobaric warhead for RShG-1/RPG-27 has a 10m lethal radius. For 100m you would need something far bigger.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

Thanks for pointing it out though, I couldn't find data on that warhead, I guess my guess was off by an order of magnitude.