this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
91 points (88.9% liked)

Linux

8723 readers
400 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

These “Wayland will never come” articles completely ignore the fact that Wayland is here and has already won.

There are lots of issues with Wayland. They will be fixed, but if this was simply a list of things still needing to be improved, it would be useful.

But most Linux desktop users use Wayland already. It will be 90% in 2-3 years. With the exception of Mint, the big Linux distros already install to Linux by default. So almost every new Linux user starts on Wayland. Few will ever try X11. And if they did, the list of broken and impaired experiences on X11 will bring most back to Wayland.

It really does not matter if every x11 user switches to Wayland. The ecosystem does not need them.

But very few of even the hard core adherents will use an X server 5 years from now. Most normal users will not even use Xwayland. And the simple reason is applications.

Everyday there are more and more apps that are Wayland only. Before 2030, that list will include all GNOME and most GTK apps. Are people really going to give up all these applications because of some obscure advantage they perceive in X11?

Most the the faults the article cites are exaggerated or historical. But it is not worth arguing over the details. Wayland is the future. But it is already the present. It is sad really that the people writing these articles do not realize that they are already in the minority and have already been left behind.

This is a “Linux will never be ready for all UNIX users” article written in 1998. It is both true and irrelevant.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The only thing stopping me from switching is the fact TigerVNC server doesn't support it, I wouldn't be able to LAN remote into my workstation.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean by that? I'm using TigerVNC with wayvnc on sway

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I currently use Arch/X11/KDE with TigerVNC, I remember there being issues half a year ago when I last checked it.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you share the contact of your copium dealer?

Because, really, this is one of the most disparagated stuff I've ever read this year.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 3 hours ago

Disparagated? I assume you mean disparaging but that does not really track to the copium comment.

I know I am coming off a bit harsh. I am just tired of Xorg fans going off about how Wayland is not ready when it is already the most popular desktop Linux display server.

I don’t like systemd but I would not be expected to be taken very seriously if I wrote an article saying that people will never use it when 90% of Linux desktops are systemd based.

Or perhaps in should write an article about how nobody clang is not ready because I have a use case it does not fit.

And the list of things that Wayland can do that Xorg cannot is longer than the reverse at this point. So, a list of things you prefer about Xorg is just a personal preference at best at this point. Trying to argue that Wayland is “not ready” when it is both more advanced and more popular should be called out for what it is.

Shouting that the guy crossing the finish line ahead of you does not stand a chance just sounds stupid. And that is what this article is doing.