this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
554 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
73534 readers
2480 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've been thinking about exactly this... you could probably get an apples to apples comparison, by comparing only a specific model year.
IE, how did every 2023 car perform in the year 2024? Then, parse that by the vehicle's price, or maybe by its propulsion type, maybe both. THAT would be how an honest study of the question would go.
Of course, Tesla knows that, they can afford really great data scientists. Makes you wonder why they run their obviously flawed safety study instead.
Tesla even has the best data source for a control group in house: those of their customers who don't use autopilot.
They use identical cars with identical security features and Tesla has all the data. It would be trivial for them to compare those numbers.
As you say: there has to be a reason why they don't go for this extremely low hanging fruit.
Oh, RIGHT, that XD