this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
255 points (99.2% liked)

Femcel Memes

2348 readers
558 users here now

Welcome to femcel memes. A place where anybody can post memes that fit the vibe.

Warning: We have a tendency to post things that may at times come from a self-deprecating perspective or things that are funny coming from another queer person. This space will always be a safe place for transfems, non-binary people, people with a feminine gender expression (GNC or otherwise) or anybody else in the LGBT Community to come together and share about our experiences but we truly feel that laughing about the sometimes silly and embarrassing parts the queer experience can help bring us together. We never mean offense or harm in anything posted but rather they are satirical takes coming from queer people.

A note about 'Egging': Our community is mostly made up of transfem individuals, and as such most memes posted will be posted with the intention of having a transfem perspective. However, regardless of gender identity, all feminine presenting individuals are welcome here. Whether that means you're NB, GNC, transmasc, or any other identity, you are welcome here. It is not our intention or goal to invalidate these identities. If something makes you uncomfortable, please feel free to report the post and I will address your concerns on an individual level. For more information regarding the problems with 'Egg-culture', please see Here.

Love Y'all and thank you for following this community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (11 children)

idk if assassination is a warcrime when killing foot soldiers is acceptable.

Also doubt that such a method is outlawed, as it's probably never happened.I'm guessing that anymore that has dropped people out of planes would need to capture the people first, making it cruelty to POWs, whereas I would wanna fly into their base with superpowers and pancake them near where I got them. Don't think they'd be considered POWs when I just could've bashed their faces in with a mace. Until they specifically outlaw that, I'm still acting within the rules of warfare.

[–] guber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (10 children)

yeah i mean this really aint serious so just for the sake of theoreticals if we say that for whatever reason dropping enemy combatants from altitude is your only/most effective form of combat then it may be justified, however if done for any other reason it would be in violation of the following international law:

Geneva Conventions (1949) – Common Article 3

"Persons taking no active part in the hostilities… shall in all circumstances be treated humanely… the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

  • (a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture…"
    — Common Article 3, Geneva Conventions of 1949

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998)

Article 8(2)(b)(xxi):
"Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;"

Article 8(2)(b)(xxv):
"Employing means of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering;"

Article 8(2)(a)(i):
"Wilful killing" of persons protected under the Geneva Conventions is a war crime.

Customary International Humanitarian Law (ICRC Study, 2005)

Rule 70: Weapons or methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering are prohibited.

Rule 90: Torture, cruel or inhuman treatment and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, are prohibited.

and also you should have a moral obligation to treat humans humanely, if nothing else, but thats just my opinion

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For curiosity's sake: do they define "active part"? Do propagandists take an active part in hostilities by riling the base to actions?

[–] guber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

good point, no, propagandists are not active combatants, because they do not engage in combat (unless they are also soldiers). this kind of thinking follows from the idea that civilians contributing to the economy of a warring country could by the same logic be deemed combatants, which would be undesirable for the intetests of minimizing civillian loss

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)