this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
674 points (99.6% liked)
Technology
73534 readers
2386 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hopefully Newag (the manufacturer) loses this case. This is malicious design on Newag's part.
Malicious design is putting it mildly. This is fraud with a bit of blackmail sprinkled in. They bricked perfectly functioning trains that their customers already had paid for, because another workshop was chosen for servicing them after the warranty period of the train ended. Then they charged over 20k € to unlock trains they deliberately locked before. The unlocking itself took them 10 minutes.
In a just world the Newag CEOs would go to jail for this, but sadly we all know this won't happen.
Sabotage. Property made unusable. Passengers were literally stranded in the middle of a journey.
Yeah, this has a criminal component of endangering train traffic and putting hundreds of lives at risk.
This is not merely fraud or property damage. This should be seen in the context of attempted homicide.
The story I read the trains were bricked in the maintenance yards. Do you have the source about passangers?
This very article.
Thanks! (I hope you didn't expect me to read the article, I'm too cool for that!)
Oh, certainly not.
This and many other things is why I always thought that even from the viewpoint of "common good" reverse engineering, copying and disassembly and whatever else of everything digitally stored should be absolutely immune to the law. Otherwise it's illegal to know if the other side is breaking the law to sue it.