this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
501 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16062 readers
595 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can they even see above water? It would be just blurry view. They do it for fun, are they?

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If you can see under water then why wouldn't they be able to see above water?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 days ago

What i mean is they can't see well while out of water, just like we can't see well when we're underwater. Our eye evolved to see above water, so when we try to see underwater, the water will mess up the light going into our eye, so everything would be blurry for us. The reverse is true for fish as well. So while they poke their head out as if they trying to take a peek, what they most likely see is blurry mess.

[–] sga@lemmings.world 21 points 5 days ago

If i am not wrong, and iirc, they have different lens systems as compared to humans (or other land dwelling beings). For us, light goes from air to a lens made of "watery" substance and then through a (different) "watery" fluid in our eyes, and then to the back. whenever you have refractive index changes (air and water have different indices(water is ~1.33)), light bends, and so, the way light would refract differently, or in other words, the angle at which "focuses" (not the current optical term here, but works in a colloquial sense, angle of cone of focus would be better) is different if you have air-watery*-watery system vs water-watery*-watery system. since fish live in water mostly, they develop for the lattery system (since most of the system is water esque, there is not much refractive difference which would bend light at larger angles), so they would have to use a more "powerful" (not correct again, better would be shorter focus) lenses, or else there eyes and eye sockets would have to be large. so if they come above water, these "powerful" lenses would resolve the focus spot before the back of eye (so they would be myopic). inverse happens with land dwelling beings going in water.

Amphibians (and some other "beings") have some special "arrangements". iirc, some frogs have an extra layer of "transparent eyelid" like thingy, that they close underwater, which gives the "additiional focussing power" required to resolve.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can't see under the water, because I'm in my bed

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Are you calling me a skinny liar?

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, I've been working on losing weight.

Not really.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago

I’ve been watching my figure

expand

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Because they have shark eyes.