this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
295 points (97.7% liked)

PC Gaming

11916 readers
292 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 153 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (12 children)

This is nothing new. Before the steam deck came out, Handheld PCs have already been ~~overpriced~~ expensive. Other manufacturers haven't bothered about affordability before, during ot after the steam deck.

That said, Gabe Newell said the steam deck was priced "painfully", which means they probably had very low margins on the hardware and are making it back on sales on their store. Other manufacturers do not have that luxury.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Steam Deck hits a sweet spot. You can make it more powerful, but it'll cost significantly more. You can make it cheaper, but you'll cut out too many games people want to play.

Also, anything like this with a resolution higher than 720p is wasting pixels and GPU power, IMO.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)
  1. you couldn't make it more powerful, it had the best of the best.
  2. my eyes work, and I still I don't think clearer text and UI is a waste
[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago

Higher resolution will mean smaller text by default.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)