this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
1257 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8757 readers
2933 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Ediacarium@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't swapping increase the chance of total failure?

You're basically using them equally, which makes it more likely that the surviving hard drive failes while copy the data to the future brand new replacement drive.

(This is obviously assuming, that storing a drive is different to you using the drive and that both drives will fail around the same time)

[โ€“] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Meh, anything can happen at any time, I've come to accept that.

These are basically brand new surveillance grade hard drives, which means they're designed to run 24/7 and run cooler than consumer grade drives. Neither one has any bad sectors, and they both purr quieter than kittens.

I always keep one completely offline and totally disconnected, sitting on a shelf, save for the occasional clone day where I have both connected.

I figure the chances of both failing at once are on an astronomical scale.