this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7007 readers
401 users here now

News and information from Europe šŸ‡ŖšŸ‡ŗ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week, the British National Archives published new Blair government documents.

Here is what we can learn.

UK pushed US to delay Iraq invasion over fears Tony Blair would lose power

Britain asked the United States to delay invading Iraq in 2003 over fears that then Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair would lose power as a result of a large-scale military campaign, according to newly released UK government documents.

ā€œThe US must not promote regime change in Baghdad at the price of regime change in London,ā€ wrote Sir David Manning, foreign policy adviser to Blair at the time, in a report on a three-hour meeting he held with his counterpart Condoleezza Rice in January 2003.

In a separate file, Sir Christopher Meyer, then British ambassador to Washington, criticised the Bush administration’s handling of the run-up to war.

In a 2002 US annual review, Meyer said the US had been ā€œill-served by its rhetoric: at times high-flown, neo-imperialist, moralising, unilateralist, bellicoseā€.

The push for war had been driven by ā€œfactions within the Washington elite, playing on a receptive presidentā€, and had not initially enjoyed broad support among the US public, he added.

https://www.ft.com/content/27ae17b9-b13b-4d44-b6b7-307b1dc6da40

David Blunkett personally warned Blair of ā€˜explosive’ research into immigration attitudes in 2004.

Lord David Blunkett warned Tony Blair in 2004 that Home Office research into voter attitudes towards immigration and asylum ā€œcould be explosiveā€ if published.

The Home Secretary told the prime minister that focus groups showed the British public believed Britain’s borders were ā€œcompletely open and overrunā€

Anti-migrant views were ā€œheld fairly consistently across all ethnic groups and all age groupsā€ the document said, with even established immigrant communities expressing hostility.

The findings on migration ā€œcould be explosive in the wrong handsā€ and should be circulated only ā€œin strict confidenceā€, Lord Blunkett told Blair.

https://www.ft.com/content/934a1830-c54c-4532-b484-38d5cff60a73

The Blair clothes

Tony Blair and his wife Cherie received tens of thousands of pounds in discounts on designer clothing while in Downing Street, documents show.

Between July 2001 and December 2002, Mrs Blair bought clothes worth more than Ā£75,000 – equivalent to Ā£150,000 today – but paid just Ā£31,000 for them.

Downing Street officials were worried these benefits would have to be declared under a new ministerial code, which was then coming into effect, and advised the Blairs to repay thousands of pounds. It is not clear from the papers if this happened.

Sir Tony, who was prime minister between 1997 and 2007, also benefited from a 25% discount from Paul Smith, famous for his suits.

ā€œIn terms of public perception,ā€ wrote No 10 private secretary Clare Sumner, ā€œthe amounts involved are quite largeā€.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0ep09el7jwo

Australia asked Tony Blair to avoid meeting ā€˜troublemaker’ 1999 Indigenous delegation

Tony Blair’s government was privately lobbied by Australia not to meet representatives of Indigenous communities who were described as ā€œtroublemakersā€.

A memo written by Blair’s foreign affairs adviser, John Sawers, reveal the level of angst within government circles about the trip

ā€œ>The Australians are pretty wound up about the idea of you seeing the Aborigines at all,ā€ Sawers wrote in a note to Blair.

"Their high commissioner rang me to press you not to see them: they were troublemakers – it would be like [the then Australian prime minister] John Howard seeing people from Northern Ireland who were trying to stir up problems for the UK.ā€

The memo suggested: ā€œCan’t we plead diary problems?ā€ while the word ā€œyesā€ is written in answer to this, in handwriting that resembles that of Blair.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jul/22/australia-pressed-tony-blair-to-avoid-meeting-troublemaker-1999-indigenous-delegation-archives-reveal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

One could wonder whether those types don’t wear clothes before they get into office, but it’s just like that: they want to get into office for the fucking lifestyle and that’s it.