Linux Gaming

20383 readers

654 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Gaming on Linux

Matrix:

Telegram:

Gaming on Linux

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

monolalia@lemmy.world

Sorry, but which of these distros is right for me? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 days ago by ClockworkN@lemmy.world to c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm currently trying to decide between CatchyOS and Nobara.

I'm sorry to be generating another of this kind of conversation as I can see they are getting pretty tedious. But you see I'm finally getting ready to take the plunge and try Linux again (after a brief encounter in the early 2000s).

I'm a gamer and I care a lot about gaming but I'm also a game dev. I need to be able to use Unreal Engine, Blender, Gaea, and other dev tools. My understanding is that something like Bazzite isn't right for me there.

So I've been looking at CatchyOS and Nobara. I've read their documentation and so far leaning toward CatchyOS. But sometimes people say Nobara is easier to use. I am not afraid of a command line, but frankly I don't tinker with my computer for fun. I get in and get what I need set up so I can get back to making things.

So what do you all think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The first question you should consider is whether you actually need a gaming distro. I've been using bare-ass Arch for both gaming and development and haven't had any performance or stability issues I didn't cause myself.

From the two options, Nobara is likely better for a beginner. It's based on Fedora, which has good support ~~and doesn't do anything fucky with the kernel.~~ (it does, the kernel is built with patches and custom options)

Cachy is based on Arch, which in itself requires a more in-depth knowledge of the system and/or a willingness to learn. The performance improvements they advertise with the customized kernel and scheduler options are really only relevant if you want to squeeze the last bit of performance out of the system. Your day-to-day experience will be the same.