this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)

Hacker News

2340 readers
442 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Mistral's lifecycle emissions in 18 months were less than the typical annual emissions of a single A320neo in commercial service.

So not non zero, But pretty good tbh.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

People dont like it when you point out that them commuting to work uses vastly more energy than LLM usage though.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Question is what are you getting out of it? Makes little sense to just compare energy usage.

I'm against mass aviation, granted there isn't really an alternative to flying in general except not flying. But a A320neo moves a lot of people in a year. That is actually something valuable. How much value, all things considered, comes out of running an LLM for 18 months? And what are the alternatives?