Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
The pyramids of giza are obviously fake, capitalism wasn't invented yet so there was no innovation
It wasn't capitalism, but the means of production don't seem like they were owned by the population but rather individuals still. A theocratic monarchy is the closest I could guess to call it. So basically if the U.S. is almost there
True, but this was referring to people saying that innovation won't happen without capitalism.
Yeah, everyone has dreams. Sometimes it's MLK, other times it's Pharaohs. An actual democratic communist society would be nice, but I'm afraid I'll never get to try it out
Defeatism is a poison to progress.
How could they plan this without Starbucks and Microsoft Teams?!
Imagine the scale of the HR department alone.
yeah, it was slavery, which is worse
~~Oh, I know this one! Slaves... Lots and lots of slaves.~~
Probably not, actually! Or at least, not usually. There were a lot of pyramids built over a very long period of time, and ancient Egypt definitely did have slavery in general, so I'm not going to claim there was no slavery involved. However, due to the records we have of the workers getting paid and when they worked, it's thought that most of the labour was done by farmers during the annual Nile floods since they couldn't work their fields at that time anyway
Next question, was the mass slave image created to help push the biblical idea of an oppressed society saved by their deity?
I'm only guessing here but probably egyptian society had lots of classes and some of them were poorer than others, so it could still both be true: Egypt had not slaves, but very poor people, who felt like slaves. or sth
I think they're referencing the ancient Israelites specifically. As the story goes, they were slaves in Egypt. Yahweh sends enough plagues to make the pharaoh release them, and then he gets Moses to guide them to a new home. The historicity of this is doubtful; there absolutely could have been a group of slaves in Egypt that got free and went to what would becone Israel, but there's no non-religious evidence for much of the rest of it.
Since the story is a kind of foundational tale for both Judaism and Christianity (and possibly other Abrahamic faiths like Islam, but I don't personally know about them), there's a strong motivation to look at these incredible buildings and say, "That must have been so much work that it could only have been built by forcing people to work on it. And look, the bible/pentateuch says the Israelites were slaves in that place and time."
Like a Serfdom
I've no idea, but that does sound like quite a plausible theory
Hmm, learn something new every day!
I thought that was a myth? ^[source]:^ ^a^ ^book^ ^I^ ^read^ ^4^ ^years^ ^ago^