this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
76 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6858 readers
887 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kebab@endlesstalk.org 49 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

This is the most terrible trade “deal” I’ve ever seen signed.

What US gets:

  • keeps 15% duties on EU exports with a guarantee that EU won’t retaliate
  • EU buys absurd amount of energy from the US
  • EU promises big investments in the US
  • EU buys even more military equipment from the US

What EU gets:

  • nothing
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The EU gets time to move away from the US and build their own alternatives with reliable allies.

But yes, this isn't the US of old where mutual benefit was the goal. This is "the US gets whatever it can take and fuck everybody else".

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But is EU actually gonna do this or is the plan to just wait it out when the clowns term is up and then hope for the best?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think the EU is hoping for the mid-terms and that the Democrats take over the house of representatives. With any luck they'll start doing their job again, and repeal these tariffs that Trump doesnt really have the mandate to set. It should be the house, yet somehow...

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

The Dems will not be able to repeal the tariffs if they only control the House. It currently looks very unlikely they'll control the Senate, and it's just a coin toss right now if they'll even control the house (will probably turn unlikely after Texas redistricts).

[–] kebab@endlesstalk.org 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Moving away is the opposite of pledging to do massive investments in the US and getting dependent on the American military equipment and energy

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

We're still going to need lots of US military equipment for a long time, so agreeing to that wasn't too bad IMHO. As for the investment we'll have to see. What's the time frame? Perhaps we'll see a little more sane US after the midterms?

But yeah, this isn't a win for the EU by any means. It might be less bad for the smaller countries that might have been subjected to the Thailand deal if they had been alone though. But that's not how the far right and Russia funded anti-eu brigade will frame it.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, with these 15% they're just making things more expensive for themselves

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yes. The idea is to nudge the US customers into buying a domestically produced equivalent instead, which then becomes relatively cheaper.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

If the US made not shit products then the US population would already be buying them. European products were never attractive because of their price, but because they are good.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

What is the EU supposed to invest on in the US? And how the fuck are they going to impose this on member states? Which countries are going to take the hit and do this investing and buying of military equipment/gas (ok, gas is to replace russia in the north)?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Buying from them energy will be mostly gas, which is destined for the gas hungry northern europe countries, for heating. This is counter intuitive but it makes sense. The dollar is on a sharp decline facing the euro, so more gas is bought for less money. The objective should be to stockpile gas reserves while moving away from russian gas imports and expand the sustaible energy grid and power reserve infrastructure.

The Big Orange is placated for the imediate time and life goes on.

The EU does not have the authority to mandate companies to establish bridge heads in foreign soil or anywhere, for what that may matter. So, if some companies decide to invest there it will be to soak up money from that market. But considering the political instability there, it will be a high risk endeavour. And lla long term one, as well. So long that it will be easy to camouflage intended delays with accidental ones.

What equipment? The planes deals are running away, to countries already in european soil, like France, Sweden and even Turkey. Maybe ammunition? What else? Factories are being retooled in Germany to produce weaponry. I think Austria and Poland are doing the same. Sweden and Finland... well.

These "negotiations" are laughable, at best. I refuse to accept the notion that all the people at those meetings did not realize it was for show and at the first opportunity all will be discarded, by any side.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No no we get to kiss Donnie Diaper’s ass. As I mentioned earlier.

[–] kebab@endlesstalk.org 4 points 6 days ago

That’s literally what we did. Germany wanted to keep their car exports flowing to USA, and now we are all gonna pay the price of having to buy all the American goods