this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
76 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3174 readers
384 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his wife, Angela, are longtime owners of a $1.5 million house in a gated community outside Dallas. In 2015, they snapped up a second home in Austin. Then another.

The problem: Mortgages signed by the Paxtons contained inaccurate statements declaring that each of those three houses was their primary residence, enabling the now-estranged couple to improperly lock in low interest rates, according to an Associated Press review of public records. The lower rates will save the Paxtons tens of thousands of dollars in payments over the life of the loan, legal experts say.

The records also revealed that the Paxtons collected an impermissible homestead tax break on two of those homes, and they have routinely flouted lending agreements on some of their other properties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish I could say I was surprised...

Well, actually, I could say it due to him actually being called out on it... if I didn't already believe Trump will pardon him.

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would there be a relevant state law that was violated to allow a Trump pardon could be bypassed?

Of course, a quick search reveals he's been accused and even indicted before with few consequences.

He's the state AG - he's not gonna charge himself. I doubt any other Republican from the state taking the role after him would, either. Democrats would have to mount an incredibly unlikely takeover of state government for there to be a chance of state-level action.