this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
462 points (82.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

8794 readers
2448 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree with all that. Doesn't make anyone "cool" based on their sexual preference.

[–] basiclemmon98@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not a sexual preference, it's an artistic style and subject preference.

[–] sxan@midwest.social -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My hard line is at the sexualizing animals, no matter how disguised, but whatever. It's fantasy. There are far worse role playing scenarios.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you flip it around to giving animal features to people, is that fine?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

It's fine either way, add long as they can give consent. I'm just not attracted to animals, whether it's a pig head on a human body, or an intelligent pig.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

sexualizing animals

Anthropomorphized creatures with a blend of animal and human form/anatomy, and, crucially, human-level intelligence/sapience, are not the same as the real world's "animals".

No one at a furry convention is chatting with others about how sexy someone's pet cat is, lol.