this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
351 points (99.7% liked)

Malicious Compliance

21529 readers
2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 26 points 1 week ago (13 children)

I fear that calling them out so obviously it will just push them to target vpns next.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Blocking vpns is tricky in a western society because so many companies cannot function without them.

[–] herrvogel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They wouldn't block the protocol, just the most common commercial providers. That's very easily doable.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

hey Alexa, deploy an ec2 instance of openvpn with a socks proxy and email me the connection info.

[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

what is "dumb club" ? will vmess prevent authoritarians from packet sniffing?

load more comments (11 replies)