this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
204 points (99.5% liked)

Games

20684 readers
145 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The first thing I thought when I heard about this facial recognition to verify age was now easy would be to trick the system with a game with photo mode. And for what I just read, it's really that easy.

The fun thing is that, since they claim to not save the pictures, they can't prove that you verified with a videogame... Unless they retire the claim, admit that they save the pictures and get in huge trouble with the data privacy laws.

Sigh... all this trouble to make an age verification system when the state could simply issue digital certs including simply your adult status (meaning you are not underage) that could be used in every website and that would not leak any personal data. And it would really work, as the authority issuing the cert is the state (which already knows your age) it could be automatically trusted on the internet and would keep your data safe.

[–] mobotsar@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

A state-issued cert used pervasively across all interactions on the internet and uniquely tied to a particular individual?

Some exec at Google just creamed his pants.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Could make it so it's possible to create an unique certificate for each site, though most people probably wouldn't bother

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)