this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

2551 readers
13 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are legitimate cons to fare-free public transport:

  • In places with large populations where fares currently make up a large portion of revenue, removing fares reduces the total funding and may necessitate cutting routes or frequency
  • Many more new riders, in a system that is not receiving the automatic boost in funding that would come with fares, may result in being unable to expand to accommodate the new riders adequately
  • The extra funding from tax revenue would be more efficiently spent on expanding the network (routes or frequencies) rather than further subsidising the existing routes
  • Increases in "problem riders" (though the video addresses why this is overstated)

But there are many more important pros:

  • Equity: it may have little impact on commutes to work, but opens up the ability for people to travel to other destinations much more easily
  • Lower admin costs: no need to pay fare enforcers, no need to pay for expensive tech solutions for payment systems, etc.
  • Operator safety: some studies suggest the main source of conflict between operators and passengers is at the fare box.
  • Increases ridership. Duh.

The video makes a bunch more points than just this. The above is only a summary (and already quite a lossy summary) of roughly the 1st half of the video.

[–] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another huge benefit is eliminating the mental overhead of deciding "is this trip worth the fare?" which disproportionatly affects low-income riders who have to calculate every expense.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I believe that falls under equity.