this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)
movies
1353 readers
148 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you want to be muscular you need to eat a lot, shocking. There is nothing wrong with this and you are not robbing anyone by eating more.
It looks like you didn't actually read the article before commenting. He's talking about how film sets could and should be more sustainable.
I've stopped reading at the start, whole message is weird. It feels completely disconnected from reality (he is some kind of British noble or whatever, no?) that an actor that gets paid in tens of millions complains about the number of meals he gets because they could sustain a “family.”
The food industry that generates thousands of tons of single-use plastics is wasteful; movies are so low on the scale they should be negligible.
Dude you're saying we shouldn't value his opinion because he's rich, but then go onto say that your opinion should be more valued because...
I'm not saying either of those things.