this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
193 points (94.5% liked)

memes

16588 readers
3037 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Show transcript3 panel meme. First panel: "I made a new internet slang". Second panel: "New or misused AAVE?" Third panel: "Misused AAVE".

the other 20% is either 4chan incel language or something trump tweeted in 2017

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Since language is an ever changing thing it can't really be misused, it can only evolve.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

I am not sure that's true, language can absolutely be misused, when an individual uses a word in a way nobody recognizes, it fails to function as language and is worth considering genuinely misused. It's only when a "misuse" gains enough traction that people can effectively use it to communicate that it is an evolution rather than a misuse.

The point is that the language is about use, e.g. getting a concept across, and it can absolutely fail or be applied incorrectly.

Take for example if a variety of mugs are on a table and I wanted the red mug. If I said "pass me the green mug", that would be a misuse of "green" as meaning red, and it would fail to communicate, as long as there are other mugs and my meaning cannot be inferred.

If there is clearly only one mug, a person might think I was mistaken or colorblind and still get my intended meaning, but it would still be considered a misuse of "green".

If enough people used "green" to mean red, maybe because my family thought the mistake was funny and adopted "green" to mean red as an in-joke, it might grow out of being a misuse into a new meaning.

The same thing is happening when white children misuse AAVE and generate slang, "gyatt" for example meaning "god" as in "gyatt damn" becomes mistakenly applied to mean a butt because of misunderstanding about how gyatt was originally used. The misuse becomes new slang, but it could have easily remained an obscure and forgotten misuse if it didn't catch-on with enough people such that it took on a new meaning.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If enough people used “green” to refer to “red” objects, the meaning of the word would change.

See: inversion of the meaning of the word “literally”

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago

And if not enough people use it that way, it remains wrong, which is what appears to be the point of the above comment

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)