this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
343 points (99.1% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

904 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The book came out in 2024. Wolff was recently a guest on Sidney Blumenthal's podcast, The Court of History, where he discussed his extensive access to Epstein in the course of researching a potential book -- including shocking revelations about potentially incriminating photos of Donald Trump in Epstein's possession.

The current whereabouts of those photos (if they exist) is unknown, but would likely have wound up in the FBI's possession.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Hey, FBI, I got a questions for you:

Why? Seriously, what are you doing? You've literally seen the worst humanity has to offer in this specific area yet you still go along with it? Is it a national security risk? If so, just say so. Because if it's not the only thing you are doing is destroying your credibility, defending pedos, and purposefully undermining the very concept of your organization. Are you really that scared of him? Are you getting a fat bonus to do this? Are you really willing to sacrifice it all just to save the reputation of an old rapist in his twilight years?

This man has been alive for 79 years with zero consequences for any of his actions. Even if he was convicted and sentenced now there is absolutely no sentence sufficient enough to actually punish him for his wrongdoing when in comparison to how many years he's gotten away with it. A life sentence would be like what, 2 years in prison before his age catches up with him? That's a pretty light sentence already for destroying so many peoples lives. The least you could do is give us that. He's gotten away with it for decades already so it's not like it'd make a difference in the grand scheme of things.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not for nothing man but it's the FBI. The question of who's the villain is almost always answered by the FBI. I can't think of a time in our country's history in which of the FBI hasn't been doing the most horrendous things you can think of. They've never ever been good guys. They've never been our friends.