this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1953 readers
12 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wow that judge sounds shitty.
Drunk, high on meth, multiple incidents leading up to the killing and multiple past charges.
Gave her a measly 7 years and then knocked 3 years off for bullshit - reduction for a guilty plea and for her "personal" circumstances. And eligble for parole at any time.
I don't care about her personal circumstances, and the sentence should definitely be longer in this case, but I think that there should always be a reduction for a guilty plea. Not only does it show remorse because you're admitting you did the wrong thing, but it saves the government from a lengthy and costly court case.
Pleading guilty doesn't mean you feel remorse, it just means you know you're screwed and that fighting won't help/will make worse.
But it does help prevent costly courtcases which is why they offer deals/lighter sentences in exchange for guilty pleas.
Definitely true, but if you plead not guilty then you definitely don't have any remorse. That's why judges should always have discretion with sentencing rather than mandatory minimums, so they can determine if there's remorse. They should definitely be listening to victim and family impact statements as well though.