this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
36 points (95.0% liked)

Europe

6931 readers
1037 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gee thanks for repeating the SBU handouts. Nevertheless the article continues:

But NABU, which has embarrassed senior government officials with corruption allegations, said the crackdown went beyond state security issues to cover unrelated allegations such as years-old traffic accidents. Anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International said the searches showed that the authorities were exerting "massive pressure" on Ukraine's corruption fighters. Ambassadors of G7 nations in Kyiv issued a statement saying they had a "shared commitment" to uphold transparency and independent institutions. But the ambassadors said they had met NABU officials and had "serious concerns and intend to discuss these developments with government leaders".

for more, read the article…

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right. I did read the article.

I just wanted to make clear that that arrested 2 agents and their stated reasons for doing so.

Are you implying that the SBU was lying about the number of agents arrested?

What you've quoted does not reject what the SBU stated. The headline seems to me to imply corruption in the SBU and instigate distrust. It is not clear.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s true the headline is unclear. I don’t think the headline implies the SBU being corrupt though. I find it weird though that you would as an explanation pick the formal statements of the SBU which stands accused of overreach in the article. It’s becoming a major problem that often newspapers would just repeat statements by the security services without any further investigation into their claims, and here, where there’s at least a little more info on it, even G7 representatives complaining, you chose to state the official line.

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I could not find a section in the article where they rejected that information.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn’t want to imply that, I would just generally distrust any initial statements by security forces and rather report on what the critics of those state.