this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1416 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16062 readers
513 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

Ok I've been meaning to ask this in the Space community or the NoStupidQuestions community. I've seen this news circling around the past 2 weeks and have been watching videos of people talking about it.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think the gist is that astronomers discovered with the JWST that some galaxies at the end of the observable universe appear to be younger than they are supposed to be. So it kinda blows a hole in the big bang expansion where objects farther away should be older. And that somehow ties in with the theory that our universe is inside a blackhole.

It's fascinating but I don't know what to do with that information other than just be fascinated. I think it was Neil deGrasse Tyson who said "So what does this new discovery matter to us? Nothing", because us being in a blackhole doesn't change anything in the grand universal scheme of things.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've always liked this theory, imagining the cosmos is just a series/web/tree of black holes draining into the next. Everything gets recycled eventually.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It meshes well with my occasional feeling that reality is just circling the drain.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Clockwise or counterclockwise?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I gave it some thought and got vertigo. I'm going with counterclockwise.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

I think it depends if you're in Australia.

note that we're all circling the sun but still not getting closer an inch per year

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

actually, we are inside the dream of someone else, and that one too is again in a dream ...

[–] Godthrilla@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Am I a man dreaming I'm a butterfly?

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It doesn't answer where it all came from. Whatever theory or religion you choose, there's no answer to this question apart from it suddenly appeared which implies something can be created out of nothing and that creates a whole lot of new questions and possibilities.

It's also just whitehole theory which is possible but we've never seen one and we likely should have by now.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

All that there is came from the One Great. Then came fractures, and births, and souls. But the Greater Will made a mistake.

the network of causality is like a big river, and if you follow individual lines, they either lead in circles or they stretch infinitely into the past and future or they spring out somewhere spontaneously

only in the third case is there a "spontaneous creation"

load more comments (21 replies)