this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
798 points (85.7% liked)

Political Memes

9061 readers
2499 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 90 points 1 week ago (37 children)

Thank you. I really don't get those people.

And I mean, the Democratic party doesn't exist in a vacuum. If you don't try to change anything, of course the awful "moderates" stay in charge. But it is possible to overtake them, just look at Mamdani. But some people won't even try that because "it's a lost case"…

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The point is that socialism cannot be achieved by electoral means. At best, if the masses in the street really pressure those in power, you get social democracy. That being said the choice for Americans was neoliberalism or fascism. The reasons for fascism winning go deeper than "the left was to whinny", but that's beside the point being made here.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Okay, so, which is easier for socialists to organize under? Neoliberalism, or fascism?

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Neoliberalism, obviously. Kamala probably wouldn't be in favour of people being abducted off the street and shoved into unmarked vans.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Apparently that very controversial position makes us shitlibs instead of people who would like to not be abducted by unmarked secret police and taken to a black site while we try to organize socialist political movements.

Don't you see? Only when it's all ashes can we start the utopia. /s

[–] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Playing devil's advocate here. It's probably much easier to grow a resistance against fascism than neoliberalism, as neoliberalism is comfortable enough for most people.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There are goals before socialism that ARE achievable electorally which are still worth pursuing in the meantime, like stalling fascists, or prevent genocide of immigrants and queer folks

load more comments (34 replies)