this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
16 points (80.8% liked)

Linux

8740 readers
399 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm curious about trying Arch Linux, but I want to know what's difficult or impossible with it first, as that's usually what stops me sticking with a distro.

I'm particularly interested in software/driver support. For example, NVIDIA doesn't mention Arch in its CUDA download page.

UPDATE: OK it sounds like Arch is for bleeding edge. That sounds fun, but I like things simple and reliable, so I'll still with Ubuntu. I might run Arch on my secondary drive, or toy with it in Docker.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

What are your goals or requirements? What have you found limiting in other distros?

[–] staircase@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I'm not sure I can think of an example beyond lack of software/driver support

General difficulty of use (i.e. how many things do I have to read and do for something to happen the way I want)

And I want libraries to be officially supported, whatever that looks like, mainly so I don't have to use workarounds or unverified sources (I don't want to be using lots of Arch's equivalent of PPAs, for example)

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 5 points 1 week ago

Arch is not the most widely supported distro (as in supported by the creators of programs). You will see it supported most by some of the more indie open source programs, but beyond that, Debian and Ubuntu are more likely to be explicitly supported.

Arch definitely requires you to read. It's a distro for those who want to assume greater amount of choice and freedom in their system. If you prefer an out of the box experience, try another distro.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)