networking

3178 readers

1 users here now

Community for discussing enterprise networks and the ensuing chaos that comes after inheriting or building one.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

manifex@sh.itjust.works

WiFi router vs wired router + WiFi access point? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago by anticonnor@lemmy.world to c/networking@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My Netgear Nighthawk wifi router just crapped out last weekend and I’m gimping along on the rental wifi router from my ISP, so I’m looking to buy a replacement and am torn: should I go with a single WiFi Router or a wired router plus a wireless access point?

I don’t need crazy throughput, just enough to handle some lite home automation, streaming, and a future NAS. My house isn’t large, so wifi coverage with a single device hasn’t been a problem so far. I’m also interested in flashing OpenWRT or DD-WRT to the router, so compatibility is a consideration. Hardware recommendations would be great!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I need a separate router and AP, but given a choice I'd ditch the AP. IMO there's no reason to have two devices if one provides sufficient features and wifi coverage, and it's one less thing to manage.

Regarding DD-WRT vs OpenWRT, after years of use my DD-WRT routers began intermittently losing their configurations when reset and I was unable to resolve the problem. The switch to OpenWRT was difficult but worth it because the firmware is so flexible and well supported. It has been rock solid.

Take a look at the GL-iNet Flint 2. It runs OpenWRT and should easily support everything you mention and more.