this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
79 points (95.4% liked)

politics

25103 readers
2317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
JuBe@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
79
President Trump accuses Senator Adam Schiff of mortgage fraud (anewz.tv)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Other sources:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think Kash Patel is using the FBI to dig up "dirt" on Democrats. And not even bad stuff: he is just actively investigating all of Trump's perceived enemies to see what charges might stick in court, even if they are made up. Schiff owns multiple houses, so why not try to spin that into something bad?

Basically, look up every bad thing that Republicans accused Biden of doing in Jim Jordan's "Weaponization of Government" committee, and Republicans are doing that right now.

Relevant podcast (with transcript) about a recent bullshit supreme court decision allowing DOGE goons unlimited access to social security data

Peter: ... because of this decision, your private info is functionally within the control of the White House, right? Which is something that wasn't true before. Access to enough information that you can imagine not just is there potential for, like, mass surveillance here outside of the scope of, like, the NSA and the FBI but, like, political retribution, right? They have, like, a roadmap for whatever authoritarian shit they want to do. It's just like it greases the wheels for authoritarianism in so many different conceivable ways that it's hard to list them off. But I mean, the basic bottom line here is the Supreme Court just handed Donald Trump a list of every single person in the country, how much money they've ever made, where they've lived, some of their medical histories.

Josie: Mm-hmm. Their connections, their family members, their former roommates, their educational history.

Peter: Their social networks to some degree.

Josie: Mm-hmm.

Peter: Who have you lived with? Who have they lived with, right? It's wild to think about what could be done by the administration if they really wanted to put this data to, you know, quote-unquote "good use."

Josie: I feel like the scariest part is almost the bank account information. It's like you don't—like, this is just basically pretext to cut you off from any kind of source of money you have. It's just—it just essentially, like, gives them power to ruin your life like that very easily, very efficiently.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250717123238/https://www.fivefourpod.com/episodes/the-doge-cases/