this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

39850 readers
429 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To paraphrase Mean Girls, "stop trying to make hydrogen happen."

For some years now, detractors of battery electric vehicles have held up hydrogen as a clean fuel panacea. That sometimes refers to hydrogen combustion engines, but more often, it's hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, or FCEVs. Both promise motoring with only water emitted from the vehicles' exhausts. It's just that hydrogen actually kinda sucks as a fuel, and automaker Stellantis announced today that it is ending the development of its light-, medium- and heavy-duty FCEVs, which were meant to go into production later this year.

Hydrogen's main selling point is that it's faster to fill a tank with the stuff than it is to recharge a lithium-ion battery. So it's a seductive alternative that suggests a driver can keep all the convenience of their gasoline engine with none of the climate change-causing side effects.

But in reality, that's pretty far from true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 25 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

As noted in the article comments, not only are all of the theoretical benefits just not realized, but it's also nothing but greenwashing since hydrogen is a byproduct of fossil fuel production ("green hydrogen" seems like a pipedream.

Now if only the US wasn't slowly shooting itself in all ten toes with EV production and renewable energy policies....

[–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Hydrogen does not have to be a byproduct of petroleum production, you can drill just for hydrogen.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We'll see.

Once there's enough hydrogen drilling and hydrogen production no longer depend on fossil fuel, then maybe H2 vehicules will make sense. Or maybe H2 will still be impractical due to other drawbacks.

Meanwhile it make sense to focus on less polluting options.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

Theoretically one can slap a shit ton of solar panels to produce H2 with excess energy. Not very efficient, but still very green.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)