this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)
Spaceflight
1440 readers
13 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !militaryspace@sh.itjust.works
- !space@mander.xyz
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dissimilar redundancy is a good idea, but so far it's been Dragon providing redundancy for Starliner, not the other way around.
While SpaceX want to shift from Dragon to Starship at some point, I doubt Gwynne Shotwell would let the Dragon program end prematurely, especially if there are still customers.
So, who would pay to crew-rate this "other rocket" (presumably Vulcan)? Would Boeing pay for that?
That sounds like a good move for NASA, but I'm not sure that Boeing want to continue Starliner.
The Boeing CEO isn't going to come out and say "yeah, Starliner is a business failure, we wish we hadn't done it", but that seems to be what Boeing's actions imply. "A few more flights" doesn't sound like Boeing are hustling for non-NASA customers, or that they would even be open to the prospect. If a program like Polaris or Axiom tried to purchase flights on Starliner, would Boeing be interested in selling?