this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
195 points (99.5% liked)
Work Reform
13241 readers
379 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sounds like we need to change the definition of "disabled" for this purpose. The people I'm reading about in the story are not the people I had imagined, such as Down's folks who can't do much else. I can see the later being paid less than minimum. Bring that hate.
For the people I was thinking of, with serious mental disabilities, I think we should continue with sub-minimum wage. Sound heartless? Deliberate with me.
Pretend you're an employer that requires menial tasks anyone can do. You can hire someone with Downs to handle it. Great! But if you have to pay them the same as anyone else, why bother with them? (I can argue against myself on that point!) These are people who derive great satisfaction from being able to contribute, we all do. The ability to contribute is one of the three things that drive us. (I think that's an extraordinary video that can help you frame your employment and life, why you may or may not be happy doing what you do. Worth your 10-minutes or your money back!)
Anyway, I guess dialing this thing into something sane would be too hard, too finicky for law, but I feel for the people who would be cut off from the socializing and the contribution they would otherwise lack.
Here in the Netherlands workers like that are subsidized. Meaning the employer pays less for disabled workers, while they still earn over minimum wage. The difference is paid by the government.
Technically true here as well. There are both federal and state incentives, so I might have fallen for their reasoning too: it makes sense to protect those job opportunities
However:
However some key points of the story are evidence that removing the subminimum wage does not reduce employment opportunities: reality trumps feelings. I know the highlighted stories were picked for outrage but it surely outrages me just how poorly some of these people are paid.
It’s all in the details and apparently our details are inhumane