this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
482 points (92.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (13 children)

I am not near left or right, a 1 line axis is not enough to put all the political positions into account.

After reading the first link, socialism is kindof interesting at its core, but in china you have a person that controls eveything, China is a totalitarian state capitalist system. While Socialism would give people freedom, China is doing the opposite. I am not fully invested into this topic but you can't tell me that stealing Money from bank accounts, allowing companies to do stupid investments that will become waste just to rise some numbers. Generally forbiding the fact that you have issues (disabled) or are different (religion or sexuality) is really just showing how similar this is to Hitlers time.

In Germany we have the Bundestag and its neither leftist or rightist as you elect the group you like which can be left-ist or right-ist, a group of multiple groups will be build for the few years that have together 50%. So if there is onr far-right group or far-left one, they won't be able to actually do all the harm except people elect that group 50%.

Besides having every few years either same or slight different groups that regime, there is also the Grundgesetz which protect the Human rights at its core and is not changable except all 2 buildings and 1 person allow for this. With this, everthing should be possible while having freedom.

But for China I really don't know what is the right thing. Its no different than America with capitalism at many levels because both intoxicate the human rights and nature environment. Somethinf like a Bundestag for China doesn't seem like a great idea if it would be the main thing, because China wants to grow and the Bundestag is too slow for direct and instant changes. But without, you can see corruption at many corners in China.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I am not near left or right

So you are ignorant. Its ok we have all been there. To live is to learn. I would have an essay very similar to yours a couple years ago. Then I started doing some reading.

Essentially leftism v rightism boils down to either you think people all all equals and should be treated equally regardless or you believe some people are superior to others and should get to treat others as lesser. Its simple as that.

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

If you say something is simple, then you are actually ignorant, literally. Its like saying: "There are only white and black people, simple as that."

Politics is way more complex and diverse, if you are only able to think in one direction then just don reply to me wtf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_spectrum

You also said "Its ok" and included that "all" have been there but its only you and the bubble community you live in like you are some superior peace of ****

[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Politics is way more complex and diverse, if you are only able to think in one direction then just don reply to me wtf.

unironically links political spectrum

Bruh

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It explains that there are multiple positions besides left and right. It explainst that its not just a left or right

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)