this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
618 points (97.1% liked)

Comic Strips

18511 readers
2268 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rowdy@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (13 children)

I hate AI slop as much as the next guy but aren’t medical diagnoses and detecting abnormalities in scans/x-rays something that ~~generative~~ AI models are actually good at?

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They don't use the generative models for this. The AI's that do this kind of work are trained on carefully curated data and have a very narrow scope that they are good at.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That brings up a significant problem - there are widely different things that are called AI. My company's customers are using AI for biochem and pharm research, protein folding, and other science stuff.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

My company cut funding for traditional projects and has prioritized funding for AI projects. So now anything that involves any form of automation is "AI".

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I do have a tech background in addition to being a medical student and it really drives me bonkers that we're calling these overgrown algorithms "AI". The generative AI models I suppose are a little closer to earning the definition as they are black-box programs that develop themselves to a certain extent, but all of the reputable "AI" programs used in science and medicine are very carefully curated algorithms with specific rules and parameters that they follow.

load more comments (11 replies)