this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
240 points (98.8% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5190 readers
44 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (25 children)

I got 135 once as a kid, and then as an older kid, younger adult, studied up on and learned many of the flaws with IQ testing, one of many being that... you can study for them, and perform better.

That's not supposed to be possible if it is measuring some kind of fundamental, inherent quality about you that cannot meaningfully change.

[–] HalifaxJones@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think most intelligence tests are flawed to that degree. Memorizing facts is far from true intelligence. For one, they never consider emotional intelligence in the equation. Which to me should be one of the highest standards. Empathy, for example, should be considered in intelligence tests.

[–] onlyhall@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

I am deficient in IQ and EQ lol. Sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)