this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
919 points (98.3% liked)

Comic Strips

23247 readers
1584 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 85 points 9 months ago (4 children)

To everybody acting like the desire path is the problem:

  1. If the problem for you is that it's 'bad' or 'illegal', grow a spine so that when you need to break the law, for something that matters, you can do it with dry pants.
  2. If the design doesn't take into account how people will interact with it, it's bad and lazy. Only time it would be acceptable to 'force' a way to interact with something is when there are safety concerns, and there are none here.
  3. You are traped in a cage of your own making, break free or perish like the dog you are.
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

I wanted to say that surely nobody is complaining about desire paths and then I scrolled just a little bit... yikes!

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Today, I’m astonished to learn about the existence of anti-desire path people based on the comments here

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Not that I have a particular problem with desire paths, but what's shown in the comic here is an example of how the design changed to take into account how people are interacting with it, and yet it didn't work out.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 months ago

right, it was changed specifically to deny the most popular use. so thats why it doesnt work.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The only time where the design actually changed, the designer made the point of moving the path away from whhere the desire path was pointing.

That comic captures it so incredibly well. It's almost perfect.

[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It didn't work out because the design didn't change, it was reinforced. Each attempt failed because there was no actual effort to understand why it's not working. Like wraping a leaky rusted pipe in ducktape.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Um. You did notice panel 10 - 12, right?

[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes? The new path is there because it's still shorter, people don't walk in straight lines and sharp angles. That design is still lazy and not thought out

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev -1 points 9 months ago

I mean what is a "thought out" path, besides just saying fuck it and paving whole plot. I mean maybe a funnel or something, but again kind of seems likely that we'd wind up with more desire paths forming just differently, maybe people coming from different starting points etc...

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that person you replied to missed the point entirely, and all the people who up-voted them.

[–] Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh. What is the point then? /gen

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

For me, it was heavy on the "you can't please everyone" aspect. You try and try, first at enforcing the solution you thought was best, but people have their own problems and their own agenda. Then you try to accommodate that. But you'll find that there's always someone whom you can't please.

That was my personal take-away.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seriously. The rabidly boot licking deference obedience and weird conflation if the constructed with the natural/universal is like the worst thing we get from the mostly-christian (anti)intellectual tradition.

These people are not fit to be adults in a built environment. Their states if mind should not be allowed in a world with such feats of artifice as concrete and movable type.

[–] CoffeeVector@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok being real dude, I don't think this behavior is a product of "mostly-christian (anti)intellectual tradition," it's just the type of people who never grew out of the color-in-the-lines and follow-your-line-buddy stuff from grade school. I don't think there's any spectacular political statement to be made here.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'll accept that the corellation is higher up the cognitive chain than that. You may be correct. There's still a political statement here, but that one may have been off the mark.