this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
30 points (89.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4294 readers
30 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
30
Why haven't national militaries tried this yet? Are they stupid? (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 month ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's wrong. You can't get a direct hit on a bunker with a nuke. Also nukes don't hit anything. They burst in the air to prevent all energy from going up.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When you're dealing with megatons of yield, directly above the bunker is a direct hit.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Path of least resistance + air pressure due to there being no where to go resists the explosion.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Resists, sure. Ain't nothing stopping that.