The gut microbiome of the carnivore was dominated by the phylum Firmicutes and the genera Faecalibacterium, Blautia, unspecific Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroides, and Roseburia—bacteria known for fiber degradation. Furthermore, neither alpha- nor beta-diversity, nor the functional capacity of the gut microbiome, showed differences when compared to the control groups. Additionally, the gut microbiome of the carnivore showed the least similarities with the microbiome of the cohort consuming meat on a daily basis.
In our study, we showcase the compositional and functional characteristics of the gut microbiome in an individual on a carnivorous diet, finding no differences in comparison to a control cohort. Further research is needed to investigate the short- and long-term impacts of a carnivorous diet on gut health through cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
Full Paper - https://doi.org/10.1530/MAH-24-0006
Obviously a single case study is a very limited slice and not generalizable, but it does demonstrate - in this one instance - the gut biome being comparable to the controls (i.e. not terrible for gut health).
This is a 4 year fiber elimination diet, so it goes against the hypothesis that fiber is necessary for gut health.
Issues:
This is a great point we bring up each time we read a epidemiological paper.
Nice, this guy really knows himself!
Hrmm, could one spoon of carbohydates a month skew the gut biome results?
This has to be a typo, they meant ketosis. Ketoacidosis is a medical emergency, or maybe only DKA is a emergency? this confuses me