this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
522 points (98.9% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1224 readers
393 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-06-10 03:58:19 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

But why is there"marines on street"? Isn't there a ground troops available to deal with inland issue?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't want any troops dispatched here (the national guard is theoretically fine if a lot was different), but the marines are probably best of the branches. They're the advance troops with minimal additional stuff. The army is the big guns, when they arrive its no longer skirmish or mild occupation, its gonna be a while and its full on martial law.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 2 months ago

You're right I shouldn't minimised other people trouble. I'll reformulate so it is better.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There shouldn't be soldiers oppressing the people who live here at all, it violates the Constitution. But for what it's worth the Marines are ground troops.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

TIL. Then why are they called marine then?

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They were originally part of the Navy, an amphibious force to attack from the sea. Obviously the need for that has very much declined. They are now an independent branch of the military but are technically still in the Department of the Navy.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago

I learn everyday. Thanks.