Politics

952 readers

380 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

“Block these illegal actions”: Newsom requests restraining order on Trump, Hegseth use of military (www.salon.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

California Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a temporary restraining order on Tuesday to block the Trump administration from deploying the military in Los Angeles.

The order asked a district court to block Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from mobilizing Marines and National Guard members in response to ongoing protests of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Southern California.

“Trump is turning the U.S. military against American citizens. The courts must immediately block these illegal actions,” Newsom said in a post to X.

Newsom filed the temporary restraining order on Monday, arguing that Trump’s deployment of the National Guard and Marine Corps without the state’s consent is “unlawful” and “unprecedented.” The lawsuit argues that, unchallenged, these actions could set a precedent for the rest of the country with “devastating consequences.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The immediate injunction was denied by the court, now waiting for the Trump admin to respond before 2PM ET today (11 Jun).

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Would it have been too much for the author to include the court's reasoning?!

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

The court decided to give the blackshirts 24h to file a response with a hearing set for tomorrow. There was no explanation for why an emergency injunction was not immediately granted, though I suspect said judge is worried about political persecution from the illegitimate dictatorial regime.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

The court didn't even include the court's reasoning.